There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. On the one hand, by implementing stringent rules and regulations the government can ensure that factories
and individuals apply environmentally friendly measures in manufacturing goods. On the other hand with strict policies and financial penalties in place, manufacturers are more likely to take numerous measures to curb pollution, from applying a range of recycling procedures to disposing of hazardous chemical appropriately. In other words, the more leniency and leeway the government shows, the greater the amount of pollution is. Apparently, all these merits stand the government in good stead, when it comes to shaking off this soaring.

Another conspicuous argument is that unlike other bodies, with a deluge of resources and legitimate power to fight off climate change the government is the strongest of all to do everything it takes to address the concern, such as raising awareness through a varieties of campaigns’ how a little change in our day to day life can make a positive change to this end. Hence, it is apparent why instead of others, I am focusing on the government.

From what has been discussed, one can conclude that the role played by the government in escalating, the concerns in climate change are instrumental indeed.