Government should reduce the investment in arts, music, and painting 70
Nowadays, it becomes a controversial topic that government reduce the investment in arts, music and paintings. Many people believe that it is unwarranted while others argue that it is required activity in this modern world. I firmly consider that this idea is baseless and so should be rejected. The following essay would elaborate on further reasons why it should not encourage and will lead to a plausible conclusion.
There are ample numbers of reasons why it should ignore. Firstly, cultural activities, regional events are only fundamental to any country. They are not feasible for a financial transaction. Secondly, all heritage related buildings and art are only used in the movies as a showcase.
Film stars usually use these heritage and cultural things to increase their income and express the song in the video. For instance, a recent study has affirmed that the downside of spending money in art is correlated negatively with the lack of money in other social factors. Hence, it is apparent that the government only wasting money on promoting music and paintings.
On the contrary, there is a deluge of arguments against my opinion. People believe that music and art plays a vital role in an individual’s life. To illustrate, music and art is the way of expressing emotions. So, with the help of music and art people usually, express their feelings and also feel relaxed.
In conclusion, after inspection upon further paragraphs, we concede that the benefits of investing in the field of art are indeed too great to ignore. In a nutshell, the government should reduce investment in paintings, music, and arts.
Government should reduce the investment in arts, music, and painting 71