Essay 26

Answer:

There is a myriad of reasons why offering free education to all is not practicable. First, this will involve astronomical expenditures on teachers, staff, books and other logistics. Few governments, be it wealthy or poor can successfully afford these colossal expenses without charging any fees. Apparently, the overall standard of education is likely to deteriorate. What seems more pragmatic in this scenario is that only the students from underprivileged backgrounds should be entitled to government support. Not only will this step help impoverished families become solvent and self-reliant, but it will also contribute a great deal to the development of a nation. This is because the higher the literacy rate is, the more skilled the workforce is.

Another key facet of free education for all lies in the fact that thanks to the government’s enormous budget on education, infrastructure development in other
vital sectors such as health care, accommodation, transport and the like will suffer immensely. As such, it will not benefit people as expected because people will enjoy advanced facilities in one field but will be famished or deprived in the other, due to the government’s lack of a balanced approach in its expenditures.

From what has been discussed, one can conclude that ensuring education for all is a prerequisite to the development of a nation. Nevertheless, offering it free to all, be it haves or have-notch, is not a valid and pragmatic approach to achieving this goal, as it engenders greater drawbacks than upsides.